Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Southern Railway Company v. North Carolina…

Thus, consideration of the overall prosperity of the carrier is necessarily relevant to a determination of the degree to which a deficit resulting from a given service constitutes an undue burden on interstate commerce. But neither the profitability of such freight operations as are fortuitously conducted on the same line as a given passenger service nor the profitability of all operations within any given State bears any practical relationship either to the public's need for the service in question or to the burden which the deficit imposes on interstate commerce.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Southern Railway Company v. North Carolina…

But where, as here, the Commission's findings make clear that the demands of public convenience and necessity are slight and that the situation is, therefore, one falling within the first category delineated in Colorado, it is equally proper for the Commission, in determining the existence of the burden on interstate commerce, to give little weight to the factor of the carrier's overall prosperity.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Southern Railway Company v. North Carolina…

Contrary to the suggestion of the District Court that its interpretation of § 13a (2) must be accepted to avoid 'requir (ing) the intrastate operations to bear more than their share,' 210 F.Supp., at 680, the statutory scheme which Congress has embodied in § 13a thus prescribes precisely the same substantive standard to govern discontinuance of either interstate or intrastate operations.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature