Summary

Robert F. Fairweather M-21-19 Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies (2021)

If a program that is on a three-year IP risk assessment cycle experiences a significant change in legislation and/or a significant increase in its funding level, agencies may need to reassess the program’s risk susceptibility during the next annual cycle, even if it is less than three years from the last IP risk assessment. Examples of events that may trigger an off-cycle risk assessment include but are not limited to, national disasters, national emergencies, or a change to program structure that increases payment integrity risk.
Source: Wikisource

Robert F. Fairweather M-21-19 Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies (2021)

A significant risk in managing IP risk is the potential that agencies may make investments in risk controls that negatively affect program mission, efficiency, customer experience or the overall operations of the agency. By including an evaluation of payment integrity risk in the Agency Risk Profile, agencies will identify, assess, prioritize, and respond to payment integrity risks and implement control activities to mitigate identified material payment integrity risks.
Source: Wikisource

Robert F. Fairweather M-21-19 Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies (2021)

Agencies should assess all programs with annual outlays greater than $10,000,000 for IP risk at least once every three years. The purpose of an IP risk assessment is to determine whether the total annual IPs PLUS the UPs for a program are collectively likely to be above or below the statutory threshold for the given year.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature