Robert H. Jackson, Musser v. Utah — Dissent
“ The Utah statute was construed to proscribe any agreement to advocate the practice of polygamy. [5] Thus the line was drawn between discussion and advocacy.The Constitution requires that the statute be limited more narrowly. At the very least the line must be drawn between advocacy and incitement, and even the state's power to punish incitement may vary with the nature of the speech, whether persuasive or coercive, the nature of the wrong induced, whether violent or merely offensive to the mores, and the degree of probability that the substantive evil actually will result. ”
