Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Bank of the Metropolis v. New England Bank…

It is evident that a loss must be sustained either by the plaintiff or defendant in error by the failure of the Commonwealth Bank. We see no ground for maintaining that there is any superior equity on the side of the New England Bank. It contributed to give to the corporation which has proved insolvent credit with the plaintiff in error, by the notes and bills which it placed in its hands to be sent to Washington for collection, endorsed in such a form as to make them prima facie the property of the Commonwealth Bank, and enabled it to deal with them as if it were the real owner.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Bank of the Metropolis v. New England Bank…

The question, whether the balances were usually suffered to lie for a time on account of negotiable paper actually deposited or expected to be received, and which formed the consideration on which the defence rested, is not perhaps as distinctly stated as it might have been in the hypothetical instruction requested by the plaintiff in error.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature