Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Gregg v. Moss — Opinion of the Court

The admission of Kellogg that he had received the money from Gregg gave no light on either of these questions. The judgment should not be reversed for the rejection of this testimony, whether it was in strict legal principle admissible or not.
The brief of the plaintiff proceeds to argue that the evidence before the jury does not sustain either of the allegations of advancing the money to the partnership, or the agreement of the plaintiff to convert it into capital of the partnership. With this we can have nothing to do.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature