Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Brooks v. Norris — Opinion of the Court

In this case, therefore, five years had elapsed before the writ of error was brought, and the limitation of time in the act of Congress was a bar to the writ. According to the English practice, the defendant in error must avail himself of this defence by plea. He cannot take advantage of it by motion: nor can the court judicially take notice of it, as the limitation of time is not an objection to the jurisdiction of the court. It is a defence which the defendant in error may or may not rely upon, as he himself thinks proper.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature