Summary

Samuel Nelson Preston v. Bracken — Opinion of the Court

Batty and others, just made, and the writ of error must be abated.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Wisconsin, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this writ of error be, and the same is hereby, abated.
MR. WALKER, of counsel for the defendant in error, moved the court to direct the clerk to what court the mandate, or other process prescribed by the forty-third rule of court, should be addressed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature