Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Ex Parte Story — Opinion of the Court

A bill of exceptions is altogether unknown in chancery practice; nor is a court of chancery bound to inscribe in an order book, upon the application of one of the parties, an order which it may pass in a case before it; and the facts which the defendant stated in the supplemental answer and plea which he offered, furnished no ground of defence in the circuit court; when acting under the mandate of this Court, and carrying its directions into execution.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney Ex Parte Story — Opinion of the Court

Afterwards, the case having been transferred to the circuit court, under the act of congress creating additional circuits, the defendant, on the 20th of November, 1837, obtained a rule on the complainant to show cause why the bill should not be dismissed, or the suit abated, upon the ground that Edward Livingston, the complainant in the original bill, died before the hearing and decree in the district court in 1836
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature