Roger Sherman

Summary

Roger Sherman THE LETTERS OF A COUNTRYMAN. (1892)

Is it not certain that government would be weak and irregular, and that the people would be poor and contemptible? And still it must be allowed, that each town would entirely surrender its boasted independence if they should unite in State government, and would retain only about one-eightieth part of the administration of their own affairs.
Has it ever been found, that people's property or persons were less regarded and less protected in large states than in small? Have not the Legistature in large states been as careful not to over-burden the people with taxes as in small?
Source: Wikisource

Roger Sherman THE LETTERS OF A COUNTRYMAN. (1892)

Make an absolute monarch—give him the supreme authority, and guard as much as you will by bills of rights, your liberty of the press, and trial by jury; —he will find means either to take them from you, or to render them useless.
The only real security that you can have for all your important rights must be in the nature of your government. If you suffer any man to govern you who is not strongly interested in supporting your privileges, you will certainly lose them.
Source: Wikisource

Roger Sherman THE LETTERS OF A COUNTRYMAN. (1892)

If the United States were one single government, provided the constitution of this extensive government was as good as the constitution of this State now is, would this part of it be really in greater danger of oppression or tyranny, than at present? It is true that many people who are great men because they go to Hartford to make laws for us once or twice in a year, would then be no greater than their neighbours, as much fewer representatives would be chosen.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature