Summary

Portrait of Samuel Alito Samuel Alito,  Buck v. Thaler — Statement

“ Quijano to the stand, and elicited his testimony on this point. Defense counsel asked Dr. Quijano, " [i] f we have an inmate such as Mr. Buck who is sentenced to life in prison, what are some of the factors, statistical factors or environmental factors that you've looked at in regard to this case?" 28 Tr. 110 (May 6, 1997) . As he had done in his report, Dr. Quijano identified past crimes, age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and substance
page 3, slip opinion abuse as statistical factors predictive of "whether a person will or will not constitute a continuing danger."
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Alito Samuel Alito,  Buck v. Thaler — Statement

“ He was sentenced to death based on the jury's finding that the State had proved Buck's future dangerousness to society.
The petition in this case concerns bizarre and objectionable testimony given by a "defense expert" at the penalty phase of Buck's capital trial. The witness, Dr. Walter Quijano, testified that petitioner, if given a noncapital sentence, would not present a danger to society. But Dr. Quijano added that members of petitioner’s race (he is African-American) are statistically more likely than the average person to engage in crime.
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Alito Samuel Alito,  Buck v. Thaler — Statement

“ Quijano's testimony with respect to the statistical factors:
"Q. [The prosecutor] asked you about statistical factors in predicting future dangerousness. When we're talking about statistics, are we talking about correlation or causation?
"A. Oh. These statistics are strictly correlation. There's a big distinction, and we must keep that in mind. Correlation simply says that two events happened—coincidentally happened at the same time. It does not mean that one causes the other.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature