Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Louis Beyer v. Caroline Le Fevre…

We are clearly of the opinion that the jury were not, under the circumstances of this case, warranted in finding that the execution of the will was procured by fraud, circumvention, or undue influence practised or exercised upon the testatrix.
One who is familiar with the volume of litigation which is now flooding the courts cannot fail to be attracted by the fact that actions to set aside wills are of frequent occurrence.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Louis Beyer v. Caroline Le Fevre…

We pass the first question with the observation that, whatever might have been the conclusion if the defendants had stood upon their challenge of the jurisdiction, the agreement of the parties to submit certain questions to a jury, the trial before the jury and the stipulation for returning the testimony there taken to the equity court for consideration by the judge thereof, must be held a waiver of the objection to the jurisdiction. Under the Federal system the same judge may preside whether the court is sitting in equity or as a common-law court.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Louis Beyer v. Caroline Le Fevre…

In such actions the testator cannot be heard, and very trifling matters are often pressed upon the attention of the court or jury as evidence of want of mental capacity or of the existence of undue influence. Whatever rule may obtain elsewhere we wish it distinctly understood to be the rule of the Federal courts that the will of a person found to be possessed of sound mind and memory is not to be set aside on evidence tending to show only a possibility or suspicion of undue influence.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature