Summary

Portrait of Samuel Alito Samuel Alito,  Riley v. California — Concurrence Samuel Alito (2014)

“ Despite my view on the point discussed above, I agree that we should not mechanically apply the rule used in the predigital era to the search of a cell phone. Many cell phones now in use are capable of storing and accessing a quantity of information, some highly personal, that no person would ever have had on his person in hard-copy form. This calls for a new balancing of law enforcement and privacy interests.
The Court strikes this balance in favor of privacy interests with respect to all cell phones and all information found in them, and this approach leads to anomalies.
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Alito Samuel Alito,  Riley v. California — Concurrence Samuel Alito (2014)

“ At the same time, because of the role that these devices have come to play in contemporary life, searching their contents implicates very sensitive privacy interests that this Court is poorly positioned to understand and evaluate. Many forms of modern technology are making it easier and easier for both government and private entities to amass a wealth of information about the lives of ordinary Americans, and at the same time, many ordinary Americans are choosing to make public much information that was seldom revealed to outsiders just a few decades ago. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature