Summary

Samuel Blatchford Friedenstein v. United States…

I cannot believe that congress intended, by making the law applicable to pending cases, to change a long and well established rule of pleading,-one founded upon manifest principles of justice, so as to allow a conviction of an offense upon which a forfeiture could be adjudged, without averring the fraudulent intent upon proof of which alone such forfeiture could be claimed.
Source: Wikisource

Samuel Blatchford Friedenstein v. United States…

Much stress is laid upon the fact that an information or other proceeding for the forfeiture of goods for a violation of provisions of the customs revenue acts is in form a civil action; but I do not perceive that this fact changes the necessity of alleging, as well as proving, the material facts upon which alone a forfeiture can be adjudged. Though the same strictness in pleading is not required in civil as in criminal actions, in neither can that which is essential to be proved be omitted to be averred.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature