Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Edmonson v. Bloomshire — Opinion of the Court

The intelligible ground of this decision is, that the writ of error and the appeal are the foundations of our jurisdiction, without which we have no right to revise the action of the inferior court; that the writ of error, like all other common law writs, becomes functus officio unless some return is made to it during the term of court to which it is return able
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Edmonson v. Bloomshire — Opinion of the Court

It could have been given here, and cases have been brought here where no bond was approved by the court below, and the court has permitted the appellant to give bond in this court. [5] In the case of Seymour v. Freer, [6] the Chief Justice says, that if, through mistake or accident, no bond or a defective bond had been filed, this court would not dismiss the appeal, but would permit a bond to be given here. And in all cases where the government is appellant, no bond is required. It is not, therefore, an indispensable part of an appeal that a bond should be filed
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Edmonson v. Bloomshire — Opinion of the Court

Curry, decided at the December Term, 1847, and especially in the latter case, it was held, on full consideration, that whether a case was attempted to be brought to this court by writ of error, or appeal, the record must be filed before the end of the term next succeeding the issue of the writ or the allowance of the appeal, or the court had no jurisdiction of the case. This was repeated in the Steamer Virginia v. West, [1] Mesa v. United States, [2] and United States v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature