Samuel Freeman Miller

Samuel Freeman Miller

Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Egbert v. Lippmann — Dissent

The work public is, therefore, an important member of the sentence. A private use with consent, which could lead to no copy or reproduction of the machine, which taught the nature of the invention to no one but the party to whom such consent was given, which left the public at large as ignorant of this as it was before the author's discovery, was no abandonment to the public, and did not defeat his claim for a patent.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature