Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Ivinson v. Hutton (119 U.S. 604…

The conveyances of the property in controversy, which were made by Hutton to the Careys, are absolute deeds on their face, and both the Careys and Hutton insisted in their answer that the note and mortgage were absolutely discharged and satisfied according to the terms of the indorsement made by Ivinson on the record of the mortgage. This is also the finding of the supreme court of the territory.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Ivinson v. Hutton (119 U.S. 604…

This loan was to be secured by real estate, part of which was covered by Ivinson's mortgage. Before paying over the money to Hutton, Carey required of Ivinson and Hutton that Hutton's property should be released from all incumbrances, and Ivinson entered on the margin of the record of his mortgage the discharge which we have already transcribed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature