Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Putnam's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Under the income tax acts no stockholder has a separate and divisible taxable interest in the assets of a corporation even though those assets have been increased by earnings. Earnings, before declaration of dividends, while increasing the value of his stock, have never been treated as an event to mark taxable income to the stockholder. Mere declaration of a dividend does not alter the stockholder's interest in the corporate assets.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Putnam's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

For the earnings of a corporation to pass into the earnings of its stockholder, so as to be subject to accrual to the stockholder under Section 42, something more than a declaration of dividends with a subsequent record date to identify the distributee is required. Such a declaration leaves the identity of the recipient at large. Such uncertainty destroys any conception of accrued as involving a right to receive or an obligation to pay, elements which we think are essential for accruals under our decisions.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature