Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Zittman v. McGrath McCarthy — Dissent

The judicial procedure is not the most appropriate field to determine the great political questions of national and international magnitude that will inhere in the ultimate disposition of foreign-owned property in this country and in the determination of the rights of groups of American and foreign creditors. These great problems of national policy can be handled adequately only by the Federal Government.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Zittman v. McGrath McCarthy — Dissent

This question is whether a state attachment, obtained on assets previously blocked under Executive Order No. 8785, gives the attaching creditor any right in those assets that displaces the power of the Government to make such disposition or use of the assets as it may ultimately determine is for the best interest of the Nation and its citizens. The Court defers all questions as to 'recognition by the Custodian of the state law lien, or priority of payment' for later decision.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Zittman v. McGrath McCarthy — Dissent

The judgment was then regarded by the Treasury as the equivalent of a voluntary payment order without the creation or transfer of any vested interest, and a license was issued or denied on the same principles of policy as those governing voluntary transfers of blocked assets.' P. 14.
'The judicial procedure is generally geared to deal only with the rights and liabilities of the parties to the proceeding.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature