Stephen Johnson Field,
Lamar v. Browne — Dissent
“ It seems to me that the ruling of the majority of the court has carried the principle of protection in this case beyond all former precedents; and that the reasoning of the opinion, in its logical consequences, will justify in many instances the most wanton interference with the private property of citizens. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105) . ”
