Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Quock Ting v. United States — Opinion of the Court

It is incredible that a father would allow the exclusion of his son from the country where he lived, when proof of his son's birth and residence there for years could have been easily shown, if such in truth had been the fact. Undoubtedly, as a general rule, positive testimony as to a particular fact, uncontradicted by any one, should control the decision of the court
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Quock Ting v. United States — Opinion of the Court

If we could not believe the story in the absence of the book, we should hesitate to yield credence to it upon the exhibition of the entry. If the petitioner was really born in the United States, and had lived there during the first 10 years of his life, the fact must have been known to some of the father's neighbors, and incidents could readily have been given which would have placed the statement of it beyond all question.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature