Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Summary

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Nash v. Lathrop (1886)

Every citizen is presumed to know the law thus declared, and it needs no argument to show that justice requires that all should have free access to the opinions, and that it is against sound public policy to prevent this, or to suppress and keep from the earliest knowledge of the public the statutes, or the decisions and opinions of the justices.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Nash v. Lathrop (1886)

Paul, Minnesota, and the Lawyers’ Co-operative Publishing Company, of New York, and other foreign publishers, have availed themselves of the liberty thus granted the petitioner to publish the decisions of the court in the form of Reports, for sale to the profession, in competition with the authorized series of Reports, and to the injury of said Little, Brown & Co., and to the prejudice of the rights secured them by said contract and statute
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature