Summary

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 15 - OF THEVICES OPPOSED THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING…

To understand the truth is, in itself, beloved by all; and yet, accidentally it may be hateful to someone, in so far as a man is hindered thereby from having what he loves yet more.
Art. 2 - Whether dulness of sense is a sin distinct from blindness of mind? Objection 1: It seems that dulness of sense is not a distinct sin from blindness of mind. Because one thing has one contrary. Now dulness is opposed to the gift of understanding, according to Gregory (Moral. ii, 49) ; and so is blindness of mind, since understanding denotes a principle of sight.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 15 - OF THEVICES OPPOSED THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING…

Consequently a man is said to have an acute sense in connection with his understanding, if, as soon as he apprehends a property or effect of a thing, he understands the nature or the thing itself, and if he can succeed in perceiving its slightest details: whereas a man is said to have a dull sense in connection with his understanding, if he cannot arrive at knowing the truth about a thing, without many explanations
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 15 - OF THEVICES OPPOSED THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING…

I answer that, Dull is opposed to sharp: and a thing is said to be sharp because it can pierce; so that a thing is called dull through being obtuse and unable to pierce. Now a bodily sense, by a kind of metaphor, is said to pierce the medium, in so far as it perceives its object from a distance or is able by penetration as it were to perceive the smallest details or the inmost parts of a thing.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature