Summary

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 96 - OF THE MASTERSHIP BELONGING TO MAN IN THE STATE OF INNOCENCE…

So that one man is master of another as his slave when he refers the one whose master he is, to his own---namely the master's use. And since every man's proper good is desirable to himself, and consequently it is a grievous matter to anyone to yield to another what ought to be one's own, therefore such dominion implies of necessity a pain inflicted on the subject; and consequently in the state of innocence such a mastership could not have existed between man and man.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 96 - OF THE MASTERSHIP BELONGING TO MAN IN THE STATE OF INNOCENCE…

Art. 3 - Whether men were equal in the state of innocence? Objection 1: It would seem that in the state of innocence all would have been equal. For Gregory says (Moral. xxi) : "Where there is no sin, there is no inequality." But in the state of innocence there was no sin. Therefore all were equal.
Objection 2: Further, likeness and equality are the basis of mutual love, according to Ecclus. 13:19, "Every beast loveth its like; so also every man him that is nearest to himself." Now in that state there was among men an abundance of love, which is the bond of peace.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature