Thurgood Marshall, Mead Corporation v. Tilley — Dissenting Opinion
“ Respondents have far more than an expectancy interest in early retirement benefits. Although the benefits may not be "accrued" in the ERISA sense, respondents have earned them under the Plan by serving over 30 years with Mead, and their right to payment is contingent only upon their election to retire after reaching age 62. [2] Cf. Blessitt v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Dixie Engine Co., 848 F.2d 1164, 1174, n. 22 (CA11 1988) (" [A] n employee is entitled to expect that early retirement provisions in a plan will not be deleted by amendment shortly before the employee qualifies") . ”
