Thurgood Marshall, United States v. Davis (397 U.S. 301…
“ For if a transaction failed to qualify under one of those sections solely because of the attribution rules, it would according to taxpayer's argument nonetheless qualify under § 302 (b) (1) . We cannot agree that Congress intended so to nullify its explicit directive. We conclude, therefore, that the attribution rules of § 318 (a) do apply; and, for the purposes of deciding whether a distribution is 'not essentially equivalent to a dividend' under § 302 (b) (1) , taxpayer must be deemed the owner of all 1,000 shares of the company's common stock. ”
