Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Five Gambling Devices…

The Court also has on several occasions stated that the commerce power 'extends to those activities intrastate which so affect interstate commerce or the exercise of the power of Congress over it as to make regulation of them appropriate means to the attainment of a legitimate end, the exercise of the granted power of Congress to regulate interstate Commerce.' [6] I think it may accurately be said that every sale of slot machines affects the exercise of the power of Congress over commerce, in view of the elusive nature of the object whose interstate shipment is being controlled.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Five Gambling Devices…

I do not mean to suggest that these provisions are models of clarity; when words are left in a statute by oversight, exemplary draftsmanship hardly results. But our function is not to discipline Congress for its failure to dot the i's and cross the t's. It is rather to make certain that the conduct required has been made sufficiently clear that to impose sanctions for ignoring the statute's requirements will not violate due process of law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Five Gambling Devices…

It appears that Congress in this Act has embarked on what it deemed the most effective course of action possible to eliminate one of the major sources of income to organized crime, while at the same time yielding to the policy of Nevada and a few other states where slot machines are legal and the underworld's control and profit are correspondingly minimized.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature