Summary

Various The Best Hundred Books — Sir John Lubbock's Reply and Final List (1886)

Professor Jowett was similarly modest:—"I am afraid that I cannot add anything worth your having to Sir John Lubbock's list. It is a very good list, the chief fault being that it is too long."
Professor Freedman and Mr. Froude, too, agreeing for once, sent expressions of modest inability to compete with Sir John Lubbock. Mr. Froude said: "People must choose their own reading, and Sir John Lubbock's list will do for a guide as well as others.
Source: Wikisource

Various The Best Hundred Books — Sir John Lubbock's Reply and Final List (1886)

It will be observed that while large additions, amounting to several hundred works in all, have been proposed, very few omissions have been suggested. As regards the few works with reference to which doubts have been expressed—namely, the few Oriental books, the Apostolic Fathers, &c.—I may observe that I drew up the list, not as that of the hundred best books, but, which is very different, of those which on the whole are perhaps best worth reading.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature