Summary

Ward Hunt,  Murphy v. Arnson — Opinion of the Court

“ Again, it may be doubted whether proof that 'the use to which it may be put as a marketable commodity' resembles essential oil meets the meaning of the provision, 'bears a similitude in the use to which it may be applied.' The former carries the idea of its adaptability to sale as a substitute for essential oil, while the statute plainly refers to its employment, or its effect in producing results. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature