“ For example, instead of using [ [Title] ] and [ [Title - Section] ] , we'd use [ [../] ] , [ [/Section] ] , and [ [../Section] ] . This method is title independant, such that we could move entire works quite easily. Brief help on relative links would be included where appropriate (such as Help:Adding texts, Template_talk:header, et cetera) .
I'd also suggest standardising sections to use the section number, rather than the title. For example, [ [/Chapter II] ] instead of [ [/The Ten Primitive Persecutions] ] . ”

“ I wouldn't mind activating subpages for the main namespace, but that automatically generated link up at the top would seem to make the page (especially with our {{header}} template) look a bit ugly. Could we have that link disabled for the English WS if subpages were enabled?—Zhaladshar (Talk) 19:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC) Turning off the automatic backlink in the article namespace would be simple; it only requires a slight addition to the project stylesheet. ”

“ Information such as the source (scanned, website...) , where and when it was originally published, and which edition the current text is from. -- Quoth 12:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Not exactly. I saw you found Template:Textinfo . That is basically the standard form. Mine way of filling it out even varies diepending on what info is easily available. If you would like to sugeest something more standard you might want to put it at Template talk:Textinfo. --BirgitteSB 03:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Brainstorming I think our learning curve is too steep for new people coming to the project. ”