Summary

Wiley Blount Rutledge,  Hilton v. Sullivan — Concurrence

“ But while a classification which ignores all considerations both of efficiency and of length of service might be found unauthorized under the statutory scheme, [1] one which takes due account of efficiency, which is not wholly unrelated to length of service, well might be sustained. And in that event the Commission's judgment that veterans with efficiency ratings of 'good' or better should be preferred to all others could hardly be called arbitrary or in excess of the authority conferred. ”
Source: Wikisource

Wiley Blount Rutledge,  Hilton v. Sullivan — Concurrence

“ Since in my view Regulation A-1 is valid, regardless of whether A-1 Plus should stand, and since on the facts now before us Regulation A-1 is sufficient to exclude petitioner from restoration at this time, I do not think he has made a sufficient showing to call forth the exercise of our discretionary power in this proceeding to require the Commission to reformulate the Regulations. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature