Summary

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Cavender v. Cavender — Opinion of the Court

As the facts thus denied are conclusively established by the evidence, the denial is an aggravation of the misconduct of the appellant. A trustee, into whose hands trust assets are shown to have come, who not only fails to discharge any duty of the trust, but even denies that he has ever received the property, cannot successfully resist an application made to a court of equity for his removal.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Cavender v. Cavender — Opinion of the Court

The appellant admits, under oath, that he has made no investments of the trust assets, and placed no funds in securities of any sort, or in bank, and set aside no annuities for the benefit of the cestui que trust or the trust estate. His own admissions show neglect of duty and mismanagement of the trust estate. The neglect to invest constitutes of itself a breach of trust, and is ground for removal.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature