Summary

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Richardson v. Hardwick — Opinion of the Court

The contention of Richardson now is that, after crediting upon the contract one-half the amount received by Hardwick for timber sold and for lands sold, the half of the purchase money and other expenses, which he was to pay in case he became equally interested in the lands, has been satisfied, and that he is entitled to share equally in the proceeds of the timber and lands, and is entitled to a conveyance of an undivided half of the lands remaining unsold.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Burnham Woods William Burnham Woods Richardson v. Hardwick — Opinion of the Court

The rights of the parties must be governed by their contract in writing entered into on October 1, 1868. All their previous negotiations resulted in that contract, and it was never subsequently changed, except by the verbal agreement to extend for one year the time allowed by it to Richardson to refund to Hardwick one-half the purchase money, expenditures, and taxes paid by him.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature