Summary

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft United States v. Fruit Growers' Express Company…

Congress of course could render these false statements by the defendant a crime, but has it done so in the absence of any collusion by the railroad company? It is a nice question, but the statute is a criminal one, and may lead to heavy penalties. A defendant under such circumstances is entitled to a reasonably strict construction of the language used to effect the particular purpose that Congress has in mind. We do not think that Congress was looking to protect an independent contractor against his servants or a common carrier against its independent contractor.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft United States v. Fruit Growers' Express Company…

The railroad company, having certain duties to perform in respect of the shipments, attempts to perform them by contract with an outside person not an agent of the carrier, and is itself deceived and defrauded by the contractor and outsider in his failure to perform his contract, so that by the falsification the carrier is led into the making of the erroneous report.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature