Summary

William M. Fogarty Formal Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Downing of Iran Air Flight 655 on 3… (1988)

To minimize the risk of another accidental shoot down of a commercial airliner, the Government of Iran should be aware that any fixed-wing aircraft flying over the waters of the Persian Gulf to or from Iran is suspect as to its intentions towards U.S. Naval Units. Neither United States Naval Forces, nor those of any other nation, are capable of assessing the intentions of an aircraft in flight.
Source: Wikisource

William M. Fogarty Formal Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Downing of Iran Air Flight 655 on 3… (1988)

Although the Policy decision to utilize an AEGIS cruiser in the Strait of Hormuz and Persian Gulf was not a focus of the investigation, I believe that a few comments on that policy are in order. Probably the most serious and destructive potential threat to both military and civilian shipping in the area is the Silkworm missile. There are other serious threats, of course, but they all require overt actions on the part of a belligerent's forces in international airspace or waters and are more subject to countermeasures.
Source: Wikisource

William M. Fogarty Formal Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Downing of Iran Air Flight 655 on 3… (1988)

As the aircraft entered the 10 mile range from USS VINCENNES, the Captain was forced to make a decision. He had been told that: The aircraft is not responding to warnings; not acting like a commercial aircraft; the IFF mode and code were indicative of an Iranian military aircraft; and, most importantly, that the aircraft was decreasing in altitude, increasing in speed and on a closing flight profile with USS VINCENNES. As Captain Rogers says in his testimony, "... my confidence in confirmed to me that the aircraft was, in fact, a threat."
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature