Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Federal Power Commission v. Texaco…

What the Commission did in these cases, however, is not an 'adjudication,' not 'an order,' not 'licensing' within the meaning of § 2. Whether Pan American can qualify for a certificate of public convenience and necessity has never been reached. It has only been held that its application is not in proper form because of the pricing provisions in the contracts it tenders. No decisions on the merits have been reached. The only hearing to which Pan American so far has been entitled was given when the regulations in question were adopted pursuant to § 4 (b) of the Administrative Procedure Act.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Federal Power Commission v. Texaco…

They are kin to the kind of capital structure that an applicant has and to his ability by reason of the rate structure to serve the public interest. It must be remembered that under this Act rate increases are initiated by the natural gas company, the Commission having the burden by reason of § 4 (e) of the Act to initiate a hearing on their legality with only a limited power to suspend new rates.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Federal Power Commission v. Texaco…

Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591, 610, 64 S.Ct. 281, 88 L.Ed. 333. In a rate case under § 5 (a) of the Act the Commission can pass on existing contracts affecting rates, can find that particular contracts are 'unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory, or preferential' and thereupon has power to determine the 'just and reasonable' rate or contract and 'fix the same.' And see United Gas Pipe Line Co.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature