Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Funk Bros Seed Company v. Kalo Inoculant Company…

Machines lend themselves readily to descriptions in terms of mechanical principles and physical characteristics. On the other hand, it may be that a combination of strains of bacterial species, which strains are distinguished from one another and recognized in practice solely by their observed effects, can be definable reasonably only in terms of those effects. In the present case, the patentee has defined the combinations in terms of their mutually inhibiting and non-inhibiting effects upon their respective abilities to take free nitrogen from the air and place it in the soil.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Funk Bros Seed Company v. Kalo Inoculant Company…

The patent covers all composite cultures of bacterial strains of the species described which do not inhibit each other's ability to fix nitrogen. Bacteriologists, skilled in the applicable art, will not have difficulty in selecting the non-inhibitive strains by employing such standard and recognized laboratory tests as are described in the application for this patent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Funk Bros Seed Company v. Kalo Inoculant Company…

An inventor should not be denied a patent upon an otherwise patentable discovery merely because the nature of the discovery defies description in conventional terms. Terms ordinarily unsuitable to describe and distinguish products that are capable of description and distinction by their appearance may be the most appropriate in which to describe and distingus h other products that are not reasonably possible of identification by their appearance, but which are easily identified by their effects when being sought for or described by those skilled in the art.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature