Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Ioannou v. New York (371 U.S. 30…

This result flows from a determination by the Surrogate's Court of Bronx County that under its present government conditions are such in Czechoslovakia that it is unlikely the beneficiary would be able to enjoy her interest. Therefore its use was denied her entirely, though none of it, so far as this record shows, will ever reach Czechoslovakia.
Czechoslovakia, though Communist, is a sovereign state recognized by the United States. The descent and distribution of property in one state to the citizens of another state is clearly a proper subject of international relations.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Ioannou v. New York (371 U.S. 30…

This means that no one residing in Czechoslovakia may receive or make any disposition of property under a will probated in New York, even though it is done without the intercession of the foreign government or in fact without its knowledge, and even though there is no danger of the funds being confiscated or in fact being within Czechoslovakia's reach. If New York's purpose is to preclude unfriendly foreign governments from obtaining funds that will assist their efforts hostile to this Nation's interests, as Matter of Getream, 200 Misc.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Ioannou v. New York (371 U.S. 30…

Thus, if New York has, in effect, regulated an area of our international relations that should be regulated only by the Federal Government, or if the New York statute conflicts with existing federal policy, then that statute cannot be given effect. For ' (i) f state action could defeat or alter our foreign policy, serious consequences might ensue. The nation as a whole would be held to answer if a State created difficulties with a foreign power.' United States v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature