Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Samuels v. Mackell — Concurrence

In that case the indictment charged advocating terrorism 'by word of mouth' as a method of political reform and assembly for the purpose of such advocacy. We held that neither advocacy nor assembly in order to advocate political action may be made punishable.
Brandenburg, however, is of no help to these appellants. For while some of the counts embrace only advocacy or acts which fall within its penumbra, still others are in the field of activities far removed from the protection of the First Amendment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Samuels v. Mackell — Concurrence

It is for the state courts by sifting out the chaff from the charges through motions to strike, instructions to the jury, and other procedural devices to preserve such First Amendment rights as may be involved here. Certainly violence has no sanctuary in the First Amendment, and the use of weapons, gunpowder, and gasoline may not constitutionally masquerade under the guise of 'advocacy.'
Mr.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature