Summary

Portrait of William Rehnquist William Rehnquist United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez…

We think that the text of the Fourth Amendment, its history, and our cases discussing the application of the Constitution to aliens and extraterritorially require rejection of respondent's claim. At the time of the search, he was a citizen and resident of Mexico with no voluntary attachment to the United States, and the place searched was located in Mexico. Under these circumstances, the Fourth Amendment has no application.
For better or for worse, we live in a world of nation-states in which our Government must be able to "functio [n] effectively in the company of sovereign nations."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Rehnquist William Rehnquist United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez…

Indeed, the Court of Appeals held that absent exigent circumstances, United States agents could not effect a "search or seizure" for law enforcement purposes in a foreign country without first obtaining a warrant-which would be a dead letter outside the United States-from a magistrate in this country. Even if no warrant were required, American agents would have to articulate specific facts giving them probable cause to undertake a search or seizure if they wished to comply with the Fourth Amendment as conceived by the Court of Appeals.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature