by the Supreme Court of Korea

Summary

by the Supreme Court of Korea Supreme Court Decision 2006Do8555 Delivered on February 22… (2007 | noyear)

Meanwhile, as the Grounds for Appeal submitted by the defendant does not contain arguments other than a claim to maintain the decision by the court below, it shall not be a legitimate reason for appeal, and as the supplement to the Grounds for Appeal submitted by the state appointed attorney after the deadline of the submission of the Grounds for Appeal shall not be deemed to supplement the Grounds for Appeal, the Grounds for Appeal submitted by the defendant shall not be examined.
Source: Wikisource

by the Supreme Court of Korea Supreme Court Decision 2006Do8555 Delivered on February 22… (2007 | noyear)

When punishments are to be imposed concurrently, execution of a part of the punishment may be suspended separately. Defendant: Defendant Appellant: Defendant and Prosecutor Counsel: Attorney Kim Young-chul Judgment of the court below: Seoul Eastern District Court 2006No892 delivered on Nov. 9, 2006
Disposition The judgment of the court below shall be reversed, and the case shall be remanded to the Panel Division of the Seoul Eastern District Court.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature