Summary

| editor The Modern Review, Volume 38, Number 4… (1925)

An utterly ridiculous reason this. “Ajax” himself states that the reason why the University found it necessary to have an organ of its own was to counteract our alleged mischievous activity. Why then did not that organ ever before attempt even a belated reply to this particular charge?
Assuming it to be true, which it is not, that we “often refused to publish the contradictions sent to” us, The Modern Review never was the only journal in Calcutta or in the country for publishing contradictions.
Source: Wikisource

| editor The Modern Review, Volume 38, Number 4… (1925)

Only, if he believes it is merely fun to call people liars, he should not on his part lose his balance at being called a masked man; as, to quote his words, “masks do not necessarily hide sinister motives,” though people’s ideas of what is sinister may differ.
Just as doing good by stealth is not bad but good, though stealth for doing wrong is bad, so to mask oneself for a good purpose, i.e, to use a pseudonym for a good purpose, is not bad.
Source: Wikisource

| editor The Modern Review, Volume 38, Number 4… (1925)

As he decided in our favour, we sent him the second reply. To that there was a second rejoinder by our critic in which he, as far as we remember, brought up some new points to which consequently we replied in Prabasi.
Regarding the charge that The Modern Review suffers from lack of “editorial policy” we can only say that we care only for truth and principles, not ‘policy’, and that we try always to decide what ought to be said, not with reference to what we may have written before, but in the light of the knowledge and experience we possess at the time of writing.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature