Summary

“Ajax” The Calcutta Review, 3rd Series… (1925)

I never wrote of the inconsistencies of Babu Ramananda but of the Modern Review. I cannot claim the wide and long journalistic experience of the Editor of Dasi, Pradip, Prabasi, Modern Review and Welfare, but even “tiros in journalism” know that every respectable and responsible journal has a well defined editorial policy, and though fairness demands that views in conflict with that policy should not be shut out, the editorial columns are reserved for the expression of the particular view or views advocated by the journal itself.
Source: Wikisource

“Ajax” The Calcutta Review, 3rd Series… (1925)

If there is absolute unanimity in the Syndicate, the executive committee of the University, its critics attribute slave mentality to its members, if there is a difference of opinion, the majority is condemned as a clique! But an old man and a puritan is so fond of his own views, and so convinced of his own infallibility, that I cannot expect to convert him.
Source: Wikisource

“Ajax” The Calcutta Review, 3rd Series… (1925)

Had the University favoured a friendly journal, common sense points out that it would not wait for publication of the Report in the Statesman. But it is futile to expect common sense in an uncommon man. Babu Ramananda was once a school master, and like his famous prototype though vanquished he will argue still. He forgets that the onus of proving a charge falls on the party bringing it. Can he place before the public an iota of evidence that any editor got this report from any body connected with the University before it was made public property?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature