Summary

| editor The Modern Review, Volume 38, Number 3… (1925)

Whatever is beneficial, right and true, is what we “really advocate”, and as it is impossible for us with our limited powers to comprehend and give expression to all the good, the true and the right, we are grateful to all who help us by contributing their views to our pages and also to those who criticise us honestly or even dishonestly.
The Modern Review has been in existence for more than eighteen years, and for the greater part of this period we have tried to point out some of the defects of the Calcutta University.
Source: Wikisource

| editor The Modern Review, Volume 38, Number 3… (1925)

We also entirely agree with the Modern Review when it says—
“It is not desirable that the Government should be allowed to come into the field of University management, nor is it fair that the Government should allow the University to be controlled by vested interests and cliques. It is necessary that the Government pay for the advancement of learning; but they should see that things are done properly. We are not suggesting official management of the University.
Source: Wikisource

| editor The Modern Review, Volume 38, Number 3… (1925)

They are more likely to oblige him. Why not require the red-faced Statesman to explain how it does the trick? Why consider the “brown” “Modern Review” alone especially fortunate in obtaining confidential papers? Why attack the “brown” editor alone? Is it because masked men find it easier to waylay “brown” men than red-faced men?
“Ajax” writes:—
“The Modern Review finds fault with the last years budget because the estimated expenditure fell short of and the estimated income exceeded the actual expenditure and income. No budget can be absolutely accurate.”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature