Summary

| portal Washburn v. Miami Valley Insurance Co… (1880)

Insurance—Conditions in Policy—Explosion.—Where a policy of insurance against loss by fire contains a condition that the insurance company shall not be liable for any loss or damage occasioned by explosion of any kind, unless fire ensues, and then for the loss and damage by fire only, and a fire originates in the insured premises which produces an explosion by which that property is destroyed, such destruction is a loss by fire within the meaning of the policy.
Source: Wikisource

| portal Washburn v. Miami Valley Insurance Co… (1880)

It will be observed that the companies are protected, with respect to explosives, by making it fatal to the policies to keep them; the policies become void if such explosives are kept. Perhaps, right here, I might remark that that word “kept” must have a particular signification in this connection, and that it does not apply where explosives of a known fixed character, known to be such, were accidentally present in the structure insured; but it does apply where they were kept there knowingly, in violation of the terms which the policy contains with reference to them.
Source: Wikisource

| portal Washburn v. Miami Valley Insurance Co… (1880)

Explosions produced incidentally from the manufacturing which the parties contemplate would be carried on in the building insured, and which are an inseparable or necessary result of the process of manufacture, are not within such exceptions. These actions were founded upon policies of insurance against fire issued by the defendants to the plaintiff upon Washburn Mill A, Minneapolis, Minn. The defence was that the loss was occasioned by an explosion, and, therefore, fell within the exceptions given at length in the following opinion.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature