Summary

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 9… (1911)

It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to draw a hard and fast line between epistemology and other branches of philosophy. If, for example, philosophy is divided into the theory of knowing and the theory of being, it is impossible entirely to separate the latter (Ontology) from the analysis of knowledge (Epistemology) , so close is the connexion between the two. Again, the relation between logic in its widest sense and the theory of knowledge is extremely close.
Source: Wikisource

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 9… (1911)

Some thinkers have identified the two, while others regard Epistemology as a subdivision of logic; others demarcate their relative spheres by confining logic to the science of the laws of thought, i.e. to formal logic. An attempt has been made by some philosophers to substitute “Gnosiology” (Gr. γνῶσις) for “Epistemology” as a special term for that part of Epistemology which is confined to “systematic analysis of the conceptions employed by ordinary and scientific thought in interpreting the world, and including an investigation of the art of knowledge, or the nature of knowledge as such.”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature