Summary

Portrait of Abe Fortas Abe Fortas Avery v. Midland County — Dissent

In face of this, to hold that 'no substantial variation' from equal population may be allowed under the Equal Protection Clause is to ignore the substance of the rights and powers involved. It denies-it does not implement-substantive equality of voting rights. It is like insisting that each stockholder of a corporation have only one vote even though the stake of some may be $1 and the stake of others $1,000.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Abe Fortas Abe Fortas Avery v. Midland County — Dissent

They have a tendency to hack deeply-to amputate. And while I have no doubt that, with the growth of suburbia and exurbia, the problem of allocating local government functions and benefits urgently requires attention, I am persuaded that it does not call for the hatchet of one man, one vote. It is our duty to insist upon due regard for the value of the individual vote but not to ignore realities or to bypass the alternatives that legislative alteration might provide.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Abe Fortas Abe Fortas Avery v. Midland County — Dissent

There is no reason why we should insist that there is and can be only one rule for voters in local governmental units-that district for units of local government must be drawn solely on the basis of population. I believe there are powerful resons why, while insisting upon reasonable regard for the population-suffrage ratio, we should reject a rigid, theoretical, and authoritarian approach to the problems of local government.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature