Summary

Portrait of Alfred Binet Alfred Binet The Mind and the Brain — Book III: Chapter IThe Mind has an Incomplete Life (1907)

Aristotle’s theory recalls in a striking manner that of Kant on the a priori forms of thought. The form of thought, or the category, is nothing without the matter of cognition, and the latter is nothing without the application of form. “Thoughts without content given by sensation are empty; intuitions without concept furnished by the understanding are blind.” There is nothing astonishing in finding here the same illustration, since there is throughout a question of describing the same phenomenon,—the relation of mind to matter.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Alfred Binet Alfred Binet The Mind and the Brain — Book III: Chapter IThe Mind has an Incomplete Life (1907)

The body is matter which is only intelligible as the correlatum of form; it can neither exist by itself nor be known by itself—that is to say, when considered outside this relation. The soul is form, the actual. By uniting with the body it constitutes the living subject. The soul is the relatum, and is unintelligible and void of sense without its correlatum. “The soul,” says Aristotle, “is not a variety of body, but it could not exist without a body: the soul is not a body, but something which belongs or is relative to a body.”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Alfred Binet Alfred Binet The Mind and the Brain — Book III: Chapter IThe Mind has an Incomplete Life (1907)

The whole metaphysics of Aristotle is dominated by the distinction between form and matter. This distinction is borrowed from the most familiar fact in the sensible world—the form of solid objects. We may name a substance without troubling ourselves as to the form it possesses, and we may name the form without regard to the substance that it clothes.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature