Summary

Portrait of Anthony Kennedy Anthony Kennedy Renne v. Geary — Dissenting Opinion

If the State may exclude party designations from the ballot, it surely may exclude party endorsements from candidate statements contained in the official voter pamphlet prepared by the government and distributed to prospective voters. It is settled that "the First Amendment does not guarantee access to property simply because it is owned or controlled by the government."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Anthony Kennedy Anthony Kennedy Renne v. Geary — Dissenting Opinion

Those concerns, however, should not prevent us from independently examining the record and deciding the issues that are properly presented. In doing so, I conclude that the only constitutional challenge that is properly before us is to the action by the San Francisco Registrar of Voters in deleting references in official voter pamphlets to political party endorsements, a challenge that is fully justiciable.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Anthony Kennedy Anthony Kennedy Renne v. Geary — Dissenting Opinion

As the majority recognizes, ante, at 319, respondents in their capacity as registered voters are alleging that § 6 (b) , as applied by the Registrar to the voter pamphlets, interferes with their right to receive information concerning party endorsements. Such a claim finds support in our decisions, which have long held that the First Amendment protects the right to receive information and ideas, and that this right is sufficient to confer standing to challenge restrictions on speech.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature