Summary

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia,  Maislin Industries US Inc. v. Primary Steel Inc…

“ Finally, Justice STEVENS points to changes in the motor carrier industry occasioned in part by 1980 amendments to the statute, which amendments he says "represented a fundamental policy choice in favor of deregulation." Post, at 147. See also post, at 147-151. But the only amendments of any relevance to the requirement of § 10761 (a) that a carrier collect no rate other than the filed rate are those that remove certain pre-existing barriers to motor contract carriage, see generally Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia,  Maislin Industries US Inc. v. Primary Steel Inc…

“ Of course the subject of the second sentence, " [t] hat carrier" (emphasis added) , must reasonably be deemed to refer to a carrier covered by the first sentence-so that the obligation to charge the filed rate applies only to those carriers required to file "the rate for the transportation or service." (Thus, a motor contract carrier required to file only minimum rates under § 10762 (a) (1) can charge rates higher than those minimums.) ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature