Summary

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia Maislin Industries US Inc. v. Primary Steel Inc…

Finally, Justice STEVENS points to changes in the motor carrier industry occasioned in part by 1980 amendments to the statute, which amendments he says "represented a fundamental policy choice in favor of deregulation." Post, at 147. See also post, at 147-151. But the only amendments of any relevance to the requirement of § 10761 (a) that a carrier collect no rate other than the filed rate are those that remove certain pre-existing barriers to motor contract carriage, see generally Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia Maislin Industries US Inc. v. Primary Steel Inc…

Of course the subject of the second sentence, " [t] hat carrier" (emphasis added) , must reasonably be deemed to refer to a carrier covered by the first sentence-so that the obligation to charge the filed rate applies only to those carriers required to file "the rate for the transportation or service." (Thus, a motor contract carrier required to file only minimum rates under § 10762 (a) (1) can charge rates higher than those minimums.)
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature