Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Dixie Carriers v. United States…

That subsection [8] makes it mandatory for the Commission to establish through routes and joint rates 'whenever deemed by it to be necessary or desirable in the public interest.' The public interest, as defined in the Act, is the guide to the Commission's action. McLean Trucking Co. v. United States, 321 U.S. 67, 82, 64 S.Ct. 370, 378, 88 L.Ed. 544. The policy is to preserve all the 'inherent advantages' of the water carriers. [9] That means that a joint barge-rail rate must be established when it appears, as here, that a joint rail rate discriminates against the water carriers.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Dixie Carriers v. United States…

It was emphasized that one of the evils to be remedied was cutthroat competition, whereby strong rail carriers would reduce their rates, putting water carriers out of business. [6] There was recognition that for shippers to get the benefit of the 'inherent advantages' of water transportation there frequently would have to be joint rail-barge rates. [7] Barge transportation frequently covers only one segment of the journey to market.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature